19.05.2025
Reading time: 2 min

Two Similar Incidents at Emilia-Romagna GP Handled Differently

Two Similar Incidents at Emilia-Romagna GP Handled Differently

Lap 29: Ocon’s Retirement Triggers VSC

During the Formula 1 Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix, race control faced two strikingly similar mechanical issues — but responded with different protocols.

The first incident occurred on lap 29 when Esteban Ocon suffered technical issues with his Haas. He pulled over on the grass between Turns 7 and 8.

Race control responded by initiating a Virtual Safety Car (VSC), which temporarily slowed the race while marshals removed the vehicle. The car was positioned close to a barrier opening, making the removal efficient — the process concluded in 3 minutes and 40 seconds.

Lap 46: Antonelli Incident Requires Full Safety Car

On lap 46, a similar issue arose when Andrea Kimi Antonelli, driving for Mercedes, encountered mechanical failure and stopped near Turn 8.

However, unlike Ocon’s case, the original car evacuation spot was already occupied. This forced race officials to opt for a full Safety Car deployment instead of a VSC.

An alternative recovery route located between Turns 8 and 9 required a recovery vehicle due to the uphill terrain. The full safety car procedure involved several stages, including letting lapped drivers catch up — resulting in a delay of 14 minutes, or eight full laps.

Why Two Different Approaches?

Though both incidents were similar in nature — a stationary car on the grass — the available recovery routes and track safety logistics played a decisive role in the race control’s judgment.

The Emilia-Romagna GP showcased how FIA race directors must adapt quickly, balancing driver safety, track integrity, and race fairness under dynamic conditions.